As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a discussion about whether or not companies need to have responsibilities for social community. While I accept that businesses should spending money on prior fields, I also believe that they should have responsibilities to the society.
On the one hand, it is obvious that the highest target of a company is profit maximization. Since businesses making more money, they have more contribution to tax system which is used to tackle social problems. Therefore, social responsibilities should be the government's work. Additionally, those organizations are likely to allocate money on other purposes to keep companies constantly growing. For example, businesses tend to improve infrastructure, replace new machines to improving productivities and invest money in training more skilled employees. As a result, by using money effectively, companies are not only earning a great amount of money, but also paying more taxes to solving social issues.
On the other hand, I would believe that business should have social responsibilities as well as making money. Firstly, since companies make much profit, they are likely to expand business scale. It is necessary to corporations hiring more employees to continuously manufacture. This leads to the reduction of unemployment rate which encourages many local people to avoid committing crimes. Secondly, doing social responsibilities has profound effects on the images of companies in public. This are able to enhance the value of companies ‘s commodity without spending an exorbitant fee for advertisement on television.
In conclusion, I believe that businesses should have social responsibilities and generate profit as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
There is a discussion about whether or not companies need to have responsibilities...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[3]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...s on the images of companies in public. This are able to enhance the value of compan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66798418972 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37073281962 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7371964638 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297545200157 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104736209291 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952083956006 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206177774057 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134802272621 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.