As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
Businesses play an important role in development of each country, only when companies grow sustainably and quickly would the wealth of nations enhance. However, along with making money, social responsibilities should be emphasized by companies. On the one hand, making money of businesses benefits society enormously. It cannot be denied that tax money which companies pay for the government accounts for a large percentage of the national budget. Thanks to this money, the authority could invest in other momentous fields, such as, accelerating the innovation of education, raising the quality of health system, the result of which is the improving the living standard of citizens. In addition, when businesses expand their scale, they would create a vast majority of job opportunities. For example, due to building new industrial zones in Vietnam, Samsung has recruited hundreds of thousands of employees, especially, new graduates. The more develop corporations, the more reduce unemployment rate. On the other hand, apart from making money, businesses should be take responsibilities for society. First and foremost, the operation of most businesses has triggered the environment pollution because of gas emission from factories and waste poured into sea and rivers without waste treatment. Thus, companies have to take steps to diminish this alarming problem, for example, finding new technology to recycle waste instead of disposing them right away. Secondly, businesses should help unfortunate people and impoverished citizens by mean of subsidizing clothes, foods and even houses. By doing this, would these companies not only create better society, but also consolidate their companies. In conclusion, I argue that businesses have obligation for making money and social responsibilities. Their above actions would be useful for themselves in particular and for the society in general.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66901408451 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05287172815 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630281690141 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2364354602 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213130426816 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794273950574 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976021075103 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213130426816 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.