The idea that enterprises as take public responsibilities into consideration as important as generating profit has caused heated debate. While I agree that making money is a fundamental factor for companies, I believe they should conduct their business in a socially responsible manner.
On the one hand, profit plays a crucial part for every company to survive in the competitive environment. One reason is that companies should be able to pay their employee’s salary, cost of buildings and utilities/ maintenance. If enterprises cannot pay their bills, any concern about social responsibilities is irrelevant. Furthermore, companies can invest the money which they make in expanding their business or developing new products in order to meet changing needs of customers. By reinvesting the money, firms could help to create more job opportunities within the community which seems to be a positive action for society.
On the other hand, businesses nowadays play an integral role/ part in society instead of solely focus on making money. Firstly, socially responsible businesses not only provide sustainable business, but also have improved customer satisfaction and employee loyalty. For example, if a brand gives charitable donations, customers will more likely to come back as they know part of their payments will go into charity funds and help other people. Secondly, business activities may have effects on the environment. Production processions could lead to serious environmental degradation such as global warming stemming from factory’s emission or irresponsible discharging industrial waste. In order to run a sustainable business, it is necessary for factories to have waste treatment system before disposing their waste into the environment.
In conclusion, I would emphasize that while making profits is a top priority for businesses, social obligations should also be considered as an important aspect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6724137931 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19699807173 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634482758621 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4869493658 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239937073488 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847013536021 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829024420124 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151962799462 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493761195852 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.