When new towns are planned, it is more important develop public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With an increasing rate of population worldwide, the development of new towns and cities with the various facilities is being considered by the government to accommodate a large number of people. It is proposed that setting up either parks or sports complexes is remarkably essential than markets for residents to spending their leisure time. I believe that both facilities are essential for people to attain a healthier lifestyle and convenience.
On the one hand, it is undeniable fact that shopping malls play an extremely important role in society. This is due to the fact that the development of hypermarkets in the new township can be extremely useful as well since it could offer with the ease of shopping. For instance, when residents buy their groceries or food items from the local shopping complex without going to the major markets, they tend to save a considerable amount of time. Therefore, if residents need to buy things instantaneously, then these supermarkets located in the same area are important.
On the other hand, parks and gyms also give the town dwellers all kinds of benefits. Because the sport clubs and open areas are places which keep people healthy both physically and mentally in all ages. These facilities not only can be remarkably useful for elderly people but also utilized by children to play outdoor games. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies this situation. Many people generally carry out daily evening walks in the park, allowing them to improve digestion and blood flow, whereas the children can go out with their friends in there to enjoy the fresh air. Therefore, the government should invest in parks and sports areas.
In conclusion, I believe that the government should invest in both parks and malls because of their necessaries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...idered by the government to accommodate a large number of people. It is proposed that setting up ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1275862069 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79167481557 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4724748626 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244665991328 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735798363809 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479936068683 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136607861592 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612531540666 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.