At this moment in time, having a tendency to use social media has been generalized specially in contemporary cities. Internet has been creeping into our personal life in a decade ago and it’s against our principles to elude from it. Consequently, it is evident that overuse as well as misuse stem from deregulation on the internet’s atmosphere.
First and foremost, The internet is accessible all over the world and innovation of advanced electronic devices leads nation to get in touch with every single category whatever it is. Despite the fact that it causes impressive impacts and represent strong contributions among societies, overusing would happen conspicuously even in work conditions. Indeed, because of holding so much appeal of internet, staffs are so keen on it even at work time. Therefore, customer satisfaction and morale would have decreased later on. Furthermore, youths and teenagers are so interested in participating on social media and they regard using the internet as the most important priority. Hence, either physically and mentally are culmination of overusing. Being lazy is also deteriorates the situation and put a strain on children to be in a promotion way.
In order to solve and cope with this circumstance, both governments and societies should provide useful approaches to restrict internet’s usage. That is, having an easy access should be limited in both work and educational conditions to avoid form time squander. On the other hand, putting a compulsory lesson in high school would have an impressive impact on scholars. This perception stimulates teenager’s brain and manage their behaviors throughout this issue.
Overall, full consensus has been available among vast majority of people in which having a culmination of sustainable solutions wouldn’t spontaneously make and don’t accommodate easily unless all nations put their hands together.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50853242321 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0719150454 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665529010239 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1088536481 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809716424965 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250174158309 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313153923717 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0456664624125 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016284376401 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.