The world has seen an enormous increase in flights for leisure, business and commercial purposes around the world over recent years.
What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights?
Do you think flights should be taxed more?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Air travel has become one of the most common modes of transport these days. People rely on it for the purpose of their occupation to that of enjoying their vacation. And the benefits of flights outweigh its drawbacks. Though airline sector is a major contributor to the economy of a nation, the initiatives to impose high tax on it should not be encouraged.
Traveling by air is more comfortable, reliable and fast than any others. Moreover, flights made trade easier. For instance, comparing to the olden scenario, now the exporting and importing of both organic and nonorganic substances have become less challenging. In addition, air defence systems promise a better security, safeguarding their respective countries from the rival countries.
As the number of aeroplanes and airbuses increased, the pollution caused by them also rose dramatically. The gases emitted by the fuels used by these flights have a significant role in global warming and green house effect. Also, travel by flight is considerably expensive. Inspite of the cost, when flights are preferred more by people, the income on the other sectors of transport decreases.
Eventhough, the flights charge heavily, there is a high probability for governments to levy high taxation on them. However, would this be benefactory? The answer to this question is vague. Not only does it makes financially sound individuals less accessable to this, it also redues the frequency of air travel by them.
Therein, it can be concluded that air travel is presumably believed to be a desirable type of transport that it could be relentesly relied on. Furthermore, it is necessary that the governments should only fetch a reasonable amount of tax on this, so even the common people could enjoy its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople rely on it for the purpose of their occupation to that of enjoying their vac...
^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igh tax on it should not be encouraged. Traveling by air is more comfortable, re...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
...his question is vague. Not only does it makes financially sound individuals less acce...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: make
...his question is vague. Not only does it makes financially sound individuals less acce...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es the frequency of air travel by them. Therein, it can be concluded that air tr...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... concluded that air travel is presumably believed to be a desirable type of trans...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20629370629 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92512768093 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7332863551 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7222222222 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145891896883 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467418871084 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394615772458 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793751980365 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253408875681 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.