The burning of oil for transport especially in private cars is wasteful and environmentally irresponsible. Taxation on petrol and diesel fuel should be increased to very high level to discourage the use of private cars. To what extent would you support or reject this idea.
Recent years have witnessed an alarming hike in the price of fuels. Some members of the society believe that the excessive usage of private vehicles are the major cause of depleting levels of fuels. So an alternative solution recommended against this phenomenon was to implement taxation on petrol and diesel rather than inefficient awareness programs. Although a major proportion of the people disagree to this solution, it is a wise decision which could be considered.
Increased tax on these sources of energy namely-petrol and diesel can make public’s life worser, thereafter, people have to allocate a good portion of their incomes on these fuels. This in turn, leads to imbalances in the financial requirement of the people. Not only does it puts people in a financial crisis, it also restricts their freedom to travel. Moreover, such a situation can enhance nation wie protests and violence against the governments.
Although, it is necessary that people should have a better living condition, imposing high tax on fuels can help a better outcome of reduced wastage of these energy sources readily. Not only does it helps to meet the current need of these resources, it also enriches their sustainability. For instance, saving from today can help the present and future generation to enjoy the advantages of these resources.
It is expected that a marked increase in the fuel prices will lead to a dramatic decrease in the usage of them. Inspite of the fact that this makes people less prone to the generous use of fuels, it also counts to the protection of environment. If this scenario arises, people will opt for more public transport which leads to decreased levels of polluting agents emitted.
Thus, it can be concluded that imposing heavy tax is a better solution however a gradual increase will be more beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'put'?
Suggestion: put
...irement of the people. Not only does it puts people in a financial crisis, it also r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'put'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: put
...irement of the people. Not only does it puts people in a financial crisis, it also r...
^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'help'?
Suggestion: help
...nergy sources readily. Not only does it helps to meet the current need of these resou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'help'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: help
...nergy sources readily. Not only does it helps to meet the current need of these resou...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12251655629 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79533944897 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.160983954 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127804681758 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378649203285 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304677098103 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680270717743 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237759338761 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.