You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend?
What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge
or experience.
Everyone may consider numerous people as "friends"; however, not many are great friends who play vital roles in everyone's life. One is a close friend when he or she is loyal and supportive. People with those characteristics can creat a valuable friendship with others. Nonetheless, such close friendships may be weakened overtime due to distance or misunderstanding among friends.
As stated above, one can not easily be considered as a great friend, he or she needs to be loyal to his or her friends first. People never want to be friend with a person who always backbite them because they feel disrespected and unsafe. Some people can betray their friends in dangerous situations in the light of their own advantages. These people can hardly be close with anyone, let alone be a great friend. Second, one has to be supportive to be a good mate. For example, one can be happy and proud when his or her friend wins a competition. Likewise, one needs to be right next to his or her friends during their hard time to help them get over the burdens. One who is adjuvant will be a precious friend. Friends meeting tose two demands are sure to be great ones and creat such valuable friendships.
On the other hand, mates can be drifted apart because of unsolved misunderstandings or differences which arise later in their life among them. Quarrels are inevitable among friends and most of them do no harm to their friendships. However, if friends do not make up and keep ignoring one another, their friendships will be weaken. After a long time without talking with friends who used to be great friends, one may find it embarassing to sit down and chat again. Consequently, their friendships are broken. Some people can be close with their friends when they live near one another and go to the same schools or work in a mutual place. A friendship grown on this basis is not strong because one change in the mutual things can make friends be less close. Friends do not go to one school anymore may find keeping in contact difficult. They do not have chances to meet regularly and chat and after a period, they turn from close friends into social friends and finally, even strangers. Therefore distance or differences deadens a close friendship.
In conclusion, the more crucial a friendship is, the more precious a great friend is as both of them are hard to find. A friendship takes a long time to be made while it is weakened rapidly. People need to do everything in their power to maintain thei friendships with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 987, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...al friends and finally, even strangers. Therefore distance or differences deadens a close...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, likewise, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75056689342 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80113737553 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482993197279 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1495287333 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5769230769 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9615384615 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88461538462 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 8.67935871743 242% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208310941942 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768135096629 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040978095836 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143394657198 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314235118222 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.