The majority believes that the younger generation has higher awareness of global issues, such as environmental problems, poverty, and animal helfare and then previous ones. However, in my opinion, they are equally concerned about problems generally.
The rising awaireness of people is undeniable since unbelievable amounts of money are located on solving issues which are spread worldwidely. In most cases, young people have more availability to modern technologies, by which such the global topics are discussed and deeper knowledge about them are shared quickly and effectively. Moreover, the present Ministry of Education is adding more suitable subjects, considering urgent problems. For example, ecological studies teaching how to treat the nature in the right way and prevent such environmental issues. Furthermore, on the lessons of History, students investigate the poverty problem, especially within their country, in order to create investigated plan of overcoming it. Obviously, after taking some actions to increase the interest of young people, they are becoming more educated in these spheres and involved in this.
On the other hand, generations of first half of the last century are not as concerned of current problems primarily because the common way of getting information through mass media is TV, various news shows particularly. Therefore, their lack of presence state in the world is the main obstacle to contribute in problem solution. Nevertheless, taking into account the measures made few decades ago , it is impossible to say that their contribution and concerns were not as strong as it should be. For instance, in order to retard ozone layer depiction countries such as Canada, Norway, Sweden, and so forth banned using Clorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in aerosols, which were the main cause of destruction, in the late 70s. This movement was then supported by the whole world. As a result, according to scientists, ozone layer has already restored over the last thirthy years.
On the whole, although the majority is convinced that generally young generation participate in elimination of global problems, previous ones collaborated earlier in this as equal as they.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- Some people prefer to live in rented homes Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this trend
- the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ccount the measures made few decades ago , it is impossible to say that their cont...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in most cases, in my opinion, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52225519288 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97335511785 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643916913947 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6281125825 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.066666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167213428843 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474983743248 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503311086279 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106798687113 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762840194726 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.