Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion?
Some people are of the opinion that the youth are more aware of and concerned about global issues such as the environment, poverty and animal welfare than older people. Personally, I completely agree with this point of view.
First of all, thanks to the modern technology, young people are able to access to any information more easily than their parents as most likely they did not have such in their youth. Also the Internet gives opportunity to follow the current events like natural disasters, epidemics and economic crises in all over the world in any time. For example, you can easily to find out the latest news about Africa’s developments in terms of mass starvation and poor conditions by just typing it in Google or another search engine. Thus, young people have a chance to evaluate all effects of certain matters by themselves.
Furthermore, education takes a great deal of effort to encourage students to be aware of the current issues that affect our planet and its resources. For example, pupils learn such subjects like biology, geography and other at school. And if biology familiarizes with the nature and environment including the protection of certain animals, geography provides the basic knowledge about different countries and not only including rich and poor. In addition, at present the majority of universities have such mandatory disciplines like ecology and life security basics for the first year students. Such academic approach contributes the extension of students’ knowledge in various fields.
In conclusion, nowadays young generation have more awareness and better understanding about global issues than older one. Therefore, they should take all necessary actions to preserve our planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... they did not have such in their youth. Also the Internet gives opportunity to follo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cessary actions to preserve our planet.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34671532847 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78380084158 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.103562096 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248476127276 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806903482924 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115928450814 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171568553733 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104329242011 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.