These days, a plethora of young people nowadays, prefer to care and concern about the threat the environment, poverty and fauna face while the previous adolescents did not. I believe that this statement is true and young people nowadays are nicer to the world than the previous generation.
Firstly, nowadays, from a young age, children are taught to be kinder to anything. By the first day of kindergarten, teachers hammer into our heads that the world is carrying by fabulous and outstanding people who take care of Earth. For instance, on my first day of school, our mistress was defending a presentation on the topic of “How the world can be improved”. Without a doubt, early descent had had lessons on loving the world as well, but their main purpose was on another aspect and nowadays we incline to these notations more than we used to.
Moreover, thanks to the development of modern technology, young people have more access to any kind of information than their parents had. In addition, the Internet gives the opportunity to follow current events like natural disasters, epidemics and worldwide economic crises at any time. For example, you can easily investigate the latest news about Africa’s developments in terms of mass starvation and poor conditions by just typing it in Google or another search engine. Thus, young people have a chance to evaluate all effects of certain matters by themselves.
Finally, despite many claims and assumptions, I’ve never seen an adult who had or even have access to such a big flow of data and was curious about it.
Taking everything into consideration, I would say that the young generation nowadays, can execute anything with recent technologies and therefore have a clearer vision in the sphere of curiosity and care.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the world than the previous generation. Firstly, nowadays, from a young age, chi...
^^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...proved”. Without a doubt, early descent had had lessons on loving the world as well, bu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fects of certain matters by themselves. Finally, despite many claims and assumpt...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03728813559 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75125209802 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630508474576 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0858351712 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186616643588 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652811384659 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558498474956 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966318623452 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755489387455 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.