Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Juvenile delinquency is becoming an increase concern. Some people claim that lenient sentence can not curb the major crimes. As far as I am concerned, I can not totally agree with this.
The reason of advocate of harsh punishment is that the practice is feasible way to deterring the young criminals from reoffending. Besides, it is extremely unbiased for those victims if criminals who commit the major crimes get rid of the serve sentence only because the criminal’s age are still young. Heinous acts should be punished regardless of the age. Moreover, the youngest offenders would not realize the serious after effect of their behaviour and leave the victims and their families sufferings without the strict punishment. So the simply solution is treat them as adults if the crimes they commit are every bit as heinous as adults.
However, juveniles don not have the same physical and mental condition as adults. Therefore, the punishment would not have much effect on them. What is more, they may not have the adequate endurance for the server penalty because that may destroy their whole life and future. Compared to the adults criminals, the young ones are have greater possibility to reestablish the value, return to normal life and even shift gears to become leaders of certain areas. Also, they are more capable of learning from mistakes. Once they understand the consequences of their acts and the desired goal of life, they rehabilitate much faster.
In conclusion, I believe the naive and young as criminals are, for the sake of long-term social benefits, rigorous education and chances should be offered to them. However, if they cross the bottom line of laws again, there is no excuse for them to escape from the equivalent penalty as adults.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-22 | mifas meleraroth | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how fruit is canned. 11
- The chart below shows the rate of males and females who were overweight in Austalia from 1980 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 64
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005 52
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...he adults criminals, the young ones are have greater possibility to reestablish the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05479452055 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5946973801 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7237560027 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169917416904 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501834998523 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040722358246 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882835067069 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555809366153 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.