Many people have voiced their concerns over the humongous amount of payments that the popular entertainers in our society earn - be it movie stars, musicians, or sports personalities. This essay agrees that this is indeed a disturbing phenomenon and points out the people who, rather due to the merits of their jobs, should be allowed to take home the riches.
The celebrity culture of pur times seems to have no qualms about the insane amount of money that public entertainers are bestowed with. Everyday, the newspapers are full of stories about the rich exploits of film stars, the multi-million-dollar contracts of sports stars, the eccentrically lavish lifestyle of pop musicians, and so forth. The public turns a blind eye and carries on with their hard life in order to earn daily bread. It is indeed difficult to justify the huge earnings of a select few in the name of public entertainment.
The people who should be entitled to such riches, it comes to mind, must be those who contribute something of massive value to the nation or the human society. Such individuals devote their life for the betterment and the progress of all. Scientists and researchers in various fields are the ones that leave after them the pieces that humanity picks up in order to strive further.
In conclusion, this essay urges the general public to introspect the aforementioned insane cultural behaviour that has come to be characteristic of our times. The people who deserve recognition must receive their fair share of monetary accolades rather than those who entertain the masses for a few good moments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
... public entertainers are bestowed with. Everyday, the newspapers are full of stories abo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to further'
Suggestion: to further
...at humanity picks up in order to strive further. In conclusion, this essay urges the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... In conclusion, this essay urges the general public to introspect the aforementioned insane...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03007518797 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86310419868 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7962897878 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.636363636 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130822927314 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441324658166 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413685649491 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771390944993 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330430113468 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.