I differ on the view that employees should work overtime and employers cannot ask them to stay back post working hours. Nowadays in an individual's job there are many attributes that define his or her working hours. Some of these attributes are challenging work culture, job profile, type of work and peer pressure.
To start with, a dynamic work environment calls for that an employee has to work late. In this case, the client for which an employee is working is very demanding and this asks for the person to put an extra effort to satisfy the client needs. Another reason could be his job profile where someone at a senior post may be required to put extra hours. Moreover, he is paid accordingly as well. Third attribute could be type of work. This could be explained as sometimes an individual's work could subject him to learn while working. Since he or she is learning while on job this could mean that an extra effort has to be given in terms of learning and performing their daily duties as well. Lastly, an employee can put extra efforts to showcase his bosses that he is proactive in his job and is the best person to perform a particular task. This is the best example to handle peer competition or pressure.
Adversely, some organizations make a common practice to enforce their staff to sit back late in office even if there is not much work to do. In these cases, the company should realize that an employee is using it's resources like electricity and the output of his efforts is not necessary for the day. Often, managers want their team to stay in office as long as he is working. Such instance can create a disbelief in the team and they can even look out of organization for other opportunities.
In the end, employers should prudently use their workforce as they are an asset to the company and no company would want to lose it's most precious assets. Companies should give it's employees a chance to grow professionally and side by side to maintain the work and personal life balance as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...le working. Since he or she is learning while on job this could mean that an extra ef...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...king. Since he or she is learning while on job this could mean that an extra effor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, so, third, well, while, as to, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5329297315 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3639571718 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171438065671 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620283816368 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565284800582 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118290661996 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520267676315 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.