Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Others believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help prepare them for jobs in their chosen fields.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
People who believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study miss out the fact that this will waste student's time in learning things that they may not ever use. On the other hand, others who believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help prepare them for jobs in their chosen fields are wrong in believing that everything should be learned only for doing jobs. Learning shall not be circumscribed any such beliefs. Students shall be allowed to choose whatever they find fit to their interest and universities shall grant those courses to the desiring students provided that they are eligible for them.
To begin with, the modern day science is a mix of everything we had known. Researches from one field helps in solving problems in others. This intermix of different streams needs people with versatile skills. This versatility is something that can not be forced to be learned. One has to have enthusiasm of being able to learn the two different streams before taking upon such courses. For instance take example of computer engineers who are developing software and robotics that one day would replace natural organs, these engineer have to be equipped with the knowledge from biology as well as engineering. This kind of diversity of knowledge cannot be forced on anyone.
Secondly, universities shall make sure that they do not end up limiting their students to learn only the subjects from their streams. Students should get every chance of developing their knowledge in fields they find interesting. For an example Google's Jacquard is a project to develop designer touch sensitive clothes that would look as well as work smart, for this he has to be well acquainted with a team that is well acquainted with fashion as well as technical knowledge.
On the other hand, abiding students to learn different streams would result in them getting confused over time management. This will prevent them from dedicating the requisite time on their task of interest. Additionally, one may not even be capable of learning other streams. An artist may need weeks to finish a painting but how can he if he has to write complex computer algorithms. This confusion will only result in an under-performance in both streams and a demotivating feeling of being incapable.
Conclusively, education should encourage liberal and dynamic thinking that students posses. Hindering the flow of talent from one stream to another might pose a threat to existence of innovation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, kind of, of course, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09389671362 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68391482662 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509389671362 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.95927701 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337153100703 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093502578787 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138491158262 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175258079684 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190886939259 0.0667264976115 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.