It is believed that establishing a permanent settlement on Venus is possible. But this belief is widely disputed. Because of the harsh climate of the planet, it is asserted that establishing a lasting human settlement on this planet is not possible. But, several alternate explanation can be given to show that it is indeed possible.
To begin with, the first argument against the possibility of human settlement on Venus is that the climate of this planet exerts a very high amount atmospheric pressure every square centimetre, 100 kg per square centimetre to be exact. And therefore most of the man made structures collapse under such high pressure. But, the fact that establishing an air borne centre is possible has been overlooked. Atmospheric pressure decreases as one ascends in the atmosphere. Therefore, it is possible to construct a floating station that can sustain the pressure which are relatively low at greater heights on the Venus.
Secondly, to contradict the possibility of establishing a centre another argument is the absence of Water and Oxygen in Venus's climate. But the argument can be refuted considering the fact that planet has other elements like carbon dioxide and sulphuric acids that can be used to produce required amounts of Water and Oxygen and therefore, the idea that supply of these elements from the Earth would be needed, can be discarded.
Thirdly, the requirement of energy can be fulfilled at a floating centre by using solar panels that generate electricity from both, the light directly coming from sun and the light that is reflected by the dense clouds in Venus's atmosphere. The clouds that block the light from reaching its surface are present at 50 km above the surface, above that height significant amount of light from sun is available in addition to the light reflected by the clouds below.
Conclusively, establishing a lasting station on the surface of Venus is an impractical idea, but establishing one on Venus is not. For the reasons presented above one can assert that a floating station can be constructed above its surface.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12536443149 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85495543088 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483965014577 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.283740807 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36190221279 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105705095731 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603939338194 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180540307066 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314257133616 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.