Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Sharing of information to the general public comes with great repercussions, therefore it should be at a leaders discretion to make the decision. Many countries have laws that protect the release of information to general masses. The only reason these legislature are in place is because of the impact that the information may create on the society. Further discussion shall shed more light on the topic.
To begin with, withholding information from general population ensures that any fact which can create disturbance among day to day conduct is not released to the people as far as it is can result in evoking a maudlin response from the citizens. A proper procedure is followed by leaders to conduct the dissimination of any such fact to avoid any severe consequences.
Moreover, there are certain circumstances that demand keeping the information confidential, take for example the demonitisation carried out in india. Many political parties and leaders had censured the contemporary minister for not sharing any information on invalidation of legal tender. But as stated by many agencies and precedented procedures, it was clear that any leak of information in such cases would have resulted in failure of the step that was taken to rid country of feigned curreny.
In addition, other departments like national security and military have a code of conduct. For instance, If the mission carried out to eliminate Osama at his residence had been well branded and published in news months before the implementation, it would have been a grand failure. Similar example is from India's surgical strike on terrosit camps around the line of control, where it was demanded by many ruling ministers to share a video or some format of information as evidence to prove the impelementation of military action, but as the legislature states non of the evidence was released to public.
However, desparate situations call for desperate decisions, we know of several events when sharing the information to the public had benefited the nation. For an example, the lack of resources and eradication of funding of government of India during its war with Pakistan under the leadership of Indira gandhi after 1947, was a pivotal information released to the citizens with a corollary request to skip one meal a day to support the national funding in war.
Conclusively, from the examples and details stated above we can recapitulate that release of information is a meticulas task and great care should be taken while doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
Sharing of information to the general public comes with great repercussions, therefo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ercussions, therefore it should be at a leaders discretion to make the decision. Many c...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this legislature' or 'these legislatures'?
Suggestion: this legislature; these legislatures
...tion to general masses. The only reason these legislature are in place is because of the impact t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18092909535 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99281484835 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555012224939 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.302504818 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.266666667 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2666666667 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172174954135 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055810269837 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362834793541 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084289942387 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233105472804 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.