Communication is the magnificent way to transfer one’s feelings or notion to others effortlessly. The advanced development in technology has bestowed a myriad option to communicate through the wireless electronic products. Nevertheless, the face-to-face communication is yet being a successful method and better than e-communication, the reasons are summarized below.
According to the live communication, it is required certain deeds to imitate while sitting in front of counter speaker which is the basic things have been followed from where the communication process commenced such as, the person should sit properly and look should be on eye to eye and so on. These are the elements using to justify the character of people who engaged in interaction. Furthermore, the victorious communication means where the opponents grasped perception holistically, which is the prominent thing in in-person communication through their face reaction and may have a chance to deduce the lack of interest, so who can moderate the slang or getting attention through bizarre postures for making the effective communication. For instance, yet the interview have been conducted to induct people in organization or admitting children in school for justify the person in terms of live communication.
Though, the wireless communication is effective where the instant interaction needed which is possible in e-communication and distance is not a matter with in a minute can join together, in this manner can share images and videos to reinforce thoughts. But, it will not show how much the sender have attention and honest, which is the huge glitches in wireless communication than live communication.
To conclude this, it seems to me that to make a healthy communication, it needs appropriate context to illustrate thoughts, to make rapid communication may prefer to e-communication, rather effective communication will be possible in face-to-face communication manner.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.3376753507 336% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64864864865 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46436518723 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8733951815 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.2 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197502203246 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829188157579 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706004412059 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134085422841 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512305798876 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.