Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
There are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that media creates a disturbance in the lives of famous people and treats them in an unfair manner while others emphasize that celebrities have to pay the price of their fame by making their private lives a matter of social talk. However, I will discuss both views in a detailed manner and conclude my viewpoint.
On the one side, media has changed drastically in the past decades and it tends to focus on more gaining information that helps in making money rather than providing relevant news. The media is more concerned about poking into an individual's lives, especially into the lives of celebs. For instance, whether a sportsperson is getting married or a politician has a family party, the news channels capture every moment of information and highlight it to society by creating new headlines. Recently, a Bollywood actor committed suicide just because the media telecasted his private on their channels. As a result, the actor died in shame because of some private moments posted on news channels. Therefore, the media is too much indulged in publicizing the lives of famous persons that it leads to a detrimental impact on the mental being of celebrities but also on their family members.
On the flip side, these celebs have themselves chosen to publicize their lives. They become famous because of masses who give them love, so, the general public has the curiosity to know about their private lives such as daily route, following their diet, how do they spend weekends, and so on. People consider them as their role models and take inspiration from them for becoming successful.
To conclude, in my profound opinion, the media is undoubtedly affecting the private lives of famous people by treating them unfairly. Certainly, the media should restrict the interference in the personal lives of famous persons, however, they cannot completely avoid them. So, I believe that it is the responsibility of the paparazzi to analyze the pros and cons of news on the lives of celebrities before posting any article about about celebrities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unfair manner" with adverb for "unfair"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... lives of famous people and treats them in an unfair manner while others emphasize that celebrities...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detailed manner" with adverb for "detailed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...alk. However, I will discuss both views in a detailed manner and conclude my viewpoint. On the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...than providing relevant news. The media is more concerned about poking into an ind...
^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e of masses who give them love, so, the general public has the curiosity to know about their p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: about
... celebrities before posting any article about about celebrities.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08522727273 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7360594723 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4724272659 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324143315643 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101051010979 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680305422157 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188490332357 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052273972178 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.