In modern era, there are a slew of ways to amuse a child such as hundreds of television programmes and games etc. However, in spite of having so many options, few children enjoy repeating the same game or shows as their friends do. But is this kind of behaviour beneficial for their development and should it be permissible by their parents? Although, many guardians might not mind such an obsession but I, absolutely do not concur with this notion and will provide evidences and justifications to prove my bird's eye view.
To embark upon, diversity is crucial for the overall personality development of a child. It is simply because every sport or T. V. programme has its own purpose which definitely can not be substituted by any other means. For example, playing outdoor games like Football, Hockey and Cricket etc are good for strengthening all the muscles of body plus it even boosts the stamina. On the other hand, Chess an indoor game can never fulfil these requirements. Therefore, it is pivotal to encourage young generation to spend their energy into everything rather than paying sheer attention to only one activity.
Furthermore, replicating friends blindly might deprave them too. it is no exaggeration to claim that nowadays, it is not possible to rely on anyone as children are naive and sometime they get lured to watch some show which is highly objectionable and inappropriate for them to see. This result in the descent of their morale and character, if your child is also duplicating his actions than he will begin to degrade as well. I can give the example of my own son James, his friend used to see adult movies and being with him, he also started to watch them. Eventually, I had to culminate their relationship to save my son.
To recapitulate, I would like to mention assertively that it is unwise to allow our children to do anything under the influence of their peers. Indeed, we must keep an eye on their behaviour and their friend circle as association matters a lot. In addition, variety in games is paramount for the better growth of a child. Though, his liking is significant but parents must never compromise with their children's health and future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'slews'?
Suggestion: slews
In modern era, there are a slew of ways to amuse a child such as hundre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...friends blindly might deprave them too. it is no exaggeration to claim that nowada...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84533333333 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77749687469 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7801180942 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6315789474 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189959114756 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483778290062 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399469229223 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103754126763 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284026054595 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.