The shocking phenomenon of changing the desire to watch the similar streaming content or play same sport in children comes to the forefront. Some feel that adopting similar habits in sports and in viewing content impact child life. However; I agree with those parents who allow their children to watch and paly similar as their acquaintances. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint on the matter.
Regarding those who feel that imitating in sports and TV program affect their children capabilities, there exist a valid reason the main justification is that changing habits is simply too vast to be effective on such a small level. And, they believe that having different habits can help children prosper. The Oregonian reported just last week that estimated 100,000 parents reported that their children shared identical habits as their friend, and they all have seditious feelings and always wade into others life. And they all think in similar fashion, they never think out of the box.
Nevertheless, I cannot hold the opinion in good conscious. The fact is that similar habits feel them they all hop on the same cruise. The Harvard reported that Austrian children who share the same kind of interest in indoor and outdoor games and similar broadcasting content are more proactive they help in reducing the demands of some of the artifacts, as they create them by themselves that condense pressure on the manufacturer. The same report proved that sharing the same kind of interest help them in foster.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that playing similar sport and watching same content put a kibosh on children development. I hope, that soon every parent understands the positive change and pitches in, they may create a utopia environment for their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d in viewing content impact child life. However; I agree with those parents who allow t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for my own viewpoint ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ve they help in reducing the demands of some of the artifacts, as they create them by thems...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... condense pressure on the manufacturer. The same report proved that sharing the sam...
^^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... utopia environment for their children.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05501618123 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61854097575 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6730208806 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205404865097 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756386520792 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530993937242 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132176450387 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271937187818 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.