In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, each person is facing cut-throat competition in the job market. In my view, offering a higher position to existing employees are beneficial for the organization. In this essay, I will explain all aspects of the topic.
There are two reasons for hiring outsiders for a higher position in the organization. Education and skills are the most important key factors to hire employees for an organization. However, only technical skills and academics are not required to run companies. Firms always need to look for a balanced candidate who have skills and academics as well as proper experienced in the specific field.
On the other hand, knowledge about a company plays vital role for offering high authority. Experienced employees already gained information about the customer of the firm, and how to deal with them in future. People who have Insufficient information might play a negative side while companies have tough competition in the market. For example, current employees of the company know about the customers’ mindset and what actually they need from the industry so they can grab deal very easily compare to beginner.
In my opinion, private industries should consider loyalty of the employee. Some employees spend long period of span of their life for the firm. therefore, companies should promote their worker to higher position as a good gesture. However, it is totally depending on employees’ capabilities, dedication and working skills.
In conclusion, companies have to identify the perfect candidate who has interpersonal and technical skills for the betterment of the company. Despite having higher academic evolution, an internal experienced candidate brings more benefits according to me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... of the firm, and how to deal with them in future. People who have Insufficient informati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...iod of span of their life for the firm. therefore, companies should promote their worker ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...position as a good gesture. However, it is totally depending on employees’ capabilities, dedication ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4776119403 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95289558515 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5854071091 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3529411765 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186730776936 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588509741247 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600043276653 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965032825563 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053303069364 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.