In this cutting age computers are playing paramount role in the field of education. It is believed by some masses, that day is not too far away when teachers will be replaced by these advanced device and their role in institution will no longer be required. here I would like to discuss both views with my own perception.
To begin with, computer has been contributing massively for the student in their educational deeds. However, it provides them to access abundant theoretical data on particular subjects as there are various sources available where they can jump on anytime to know about any specific topic, they may access youtube an online video storage platform to collect visual data. Moreover, in country like Japan majority of schools have been teaching online. All of their course material are sent to students portal where they solve and submit for the evaluation. Consequently, the result has been surprising for them they have performed more better than before, there could be one reason behind this achievement self study and practice has enabled them to do so.
On the other hand, the importance of teacher is undeniable in the institution. Teachers generally provide a public service. Most directly, they educate students and influence future generations of adults. For many teachers, this is the lure of the profession. Indirectly, the collective efforts of teachers support the growth and development of society and local economies. The ability to use acquired knowledge and teaching talents to help develop young people is also rewarding for some teachers. Serving in a parent-teacher association or as a coach, club adviser or education association member are other ways to benefit the community.
To conclude ,it does not matter how advanced technology will be used to educate student in the future but the role of teacher would never diminished. Computer can give numerical and theoretical knowledge but some other valuable attributes like social and ethical values only a teacher can teach the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Here
...institution will no longer be required. here I would like to discuss both views with...
^^^^
Line 4, column 628, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...surprising for them they have performed more better than before, there could be one reason ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... benefit the community. To conclude ,it does not matter how advanced technolo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26380368098 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76782321438 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634969325153 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0248888182 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30481340466 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811861748279 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074083502294 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172229880186 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052735638477 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.