Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads .Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that more money should be spent on trains and not on new roads. This essay agrees with this statement because trains are faster and they are more economic friendly.
Trains are Faster and do have certain merits compared with the Road Transport System, They do not have high traffic and have higher maximum speed. The higher maximum speed of the train helps in reduced Journey times and unlike on road vehicles, Trains are less prone to accidents . As a matter of fact , Due to very limited traffic on railway tracks, Trains keep up more standard timings as per the Schedule without delay. A research study found that the Passengers who traveled by train saved an average of 45 minutes a day compared with the passengers who traveled by car in San Francisco Metro.
It is a well-known fact that the Trains are more economic friendly as they do not produce much carbon dioxide. Increase in the number of trains reduces the number of cars on the road, which certainly reduces the emissions of carbon dioxide. The Fall in the emissions of carbon dioxide reduces the global warming, Besides that It is very good to Passengers as they tend to suffer less from respiratory diseases. For instance, The Carbon dioxide percentage in the air went down by 10 percentage in china after spending more money on trains.
To Conclude, More money should be spent towards trains than new roads because they are more faster, reliable and are environmental friendly. Trains are also recommended because of reduced travel time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-14 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-14 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | asmita acharya | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-03 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-08 | deep979kaur | 61 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure.Researching and treating diseases are too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. 73
- Essay topics: Some people say that the Olympic Games no longer have a role to play in the 21st century. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Countries should spend more money on trains rather than new roads .Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people say that the Olympic Games no longer have a role to play in the 21st century. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Essay topics: Some people say that the Olympic Games no longer have a role to play in the 21st century. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cles, Trains are less prone to accidents . As a matter of fact , Due to very limit...
^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...prone to accidents . As a matter of fact , Due to very limited traffic on railway ...
^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
... trains than new roads because they are more faster, reliable and are environmental friendl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, well, for instance, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86923076923 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40390151577 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526923076923 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.831218206 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297337440818 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117096387021 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926592552111 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20317553629 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686658584554 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.