Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity

It is obvious that commuting via bike is more eco-friendly than other private vehicles. However, this means of transport is still gain less popularity. There are a number of reasons behind this point of views and several solutions should be proposed to make the bicycle a more popular means of transport.

There are a variety of reasons why commuters are less likely to use bicycles. One reason is that it is generally less convenient for journeys by cycling than travelling by car or motor. Nowadays, almost all people have busy and stressful lives and they are always in a hurry whereas bicycle takes them a lot of time to move from their house to workplace or school and return. In addition, they might be as wet as a drowned rat due to/ because of perspiration or precipitation if they come to the workplace by bike. Another reason for the unpopularity of bike stems from the anxiety about traffic accidents due to the rising volume of various vehicles. In big cities, the population is too crowded and traffic congestion occurs daily, so it is difficult to create a private lane for cycling. Therefore, others vehicles being on the same road such as cars, trucks, motors pose an imminent threat to the security of cyclist.

However, measures should be taken by governments and employers to increase the number of people using bikes to travel. Firstly, the government should raise citizens’ awareness of benefits of cycling through various media campaigns. Besides, factories or offices should provide changing facilities and hot shower for employees arriving wet by bike. Furthermore, authorities may discourage motorists from using their cars or motorbikes by imposing congestion charges that would help to reduce the volume of vehicles circulating on roads, then more cycle lanes would be constructed. As a result, these will keep cyclists safer and speed up their journey times.

In conclusion, it seems to me that prominently presented causes and solutions above would make the increase of cyclists be possible, especially for short trips.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gained'.
Suggestion: gained
...wever, this means of transport is still gain less popularity. There are a number of ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11869436202 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76583333222 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605341246291 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9791614971 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127093239256 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399464843195 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475259723798 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809360119191 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695210012741 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.