In the current society, the educational policy in school is under consideration. Especially parents are concerned about whether students can attend classes efficiently. Somebody said that disruptive school students should be grouped and taught separately as they influence others.
There is no doubt that some students in schools who behave awkwardly will influence others. Grouping those disruptive school students together and teaching separately can increase the efference in class. However, if we simply take up them individually, we are limiting their educational opportunities because we labelled them as a misbehaving student. This kind of behaviour will only make those students even less want to learn and may make behaviours that disrupt the classroom.
In my point of view, every student can be taught that we need to figure out why and how to teach the student. Those disruptive students may be very intelligent and find the classes boring because they thought the work is too easy. Hence, they used the time in class to do other things. Every student absorbs knowledge differently, the teaching method may not be suitable for every student. Thus, teachers need to pay attention to how to arouse students’ interest.
In addition to the attention of a teacher, the student also needs to be responsible for their learning. When they are not satisfied with the teaching method, they should ask the teacher and explain why they feel inappropriate. If there is only one-way judgement, it will not only restrict students' learning but also make the relationship between teachers and students worse. Only cooperating with each other can create a good learning environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, in addition, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35338345865 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84825487372 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567669172932 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4668902695 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342955473648 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123796633362 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994296185564 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224015699447 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682382268758 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.