Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree?
It is accepted that disordered students, who can have negative impacts on others, should be separated. While this decision may not be very effective for all the students, I believe some grades of them must be grouped, based on their age and attitude.
According to some people, separating students cannot be very wise due to the destructive influence, especially for primary school student's personality at this critical age. Despite the fact that some rebellious children might sometimes make problems for their fellow students and teachers, participating in school activities such as sports, drama or science club could lead them to the right path. Specifically, taking apart in practical classes, which are related to teamwork, could push them to be a part of society and teach them how to obey the rules. For instance, joining a football team can help these students to understand how to pay attention to the coach instructions, make a group decisions and help the team to gain victory. However, I believe that such a circumstances might be different for some intractable high school students.
I think that idea of putting restive and noisy high schoolers in diverse groups could be an impressive idea since it avoids any unwanted negative influences on others. While some consulting school program try to help disobedient students, most of them tend to disobey the rules due to dysfunctional family background. In fact, if consultative school plans for such students could be included their parents, it is possible to raise their parental skills. As a result, the problem with family will be resolved and such bad behavior children will enjoy a healthy family context. Not to mention, this could help children to become a better person in the society.
Overall, it can be predicted that children can learn from each other if they are educated in a natural environment. However, some believe that this plan may not work for all cases specially where bullies caused trouble.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, while, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13888888889 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76219738894 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0838129603 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202803036941 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715729648095 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628167012435 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117737190547 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571006393511 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.