Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that the fast expansion and growth of supermarket chains could have a negative influence on local businesses, as well as local communities. I believe that the closure of domestic business might not have an effect on local communities.
First, supermarkets and departmental stores indirectly contribute toward the surrounding community. Although these expansions may have a detrimental effect on local stores, it aids in reducing unemployment rates among the society. This is because a huge workforce is needed to operate such stores with its various department and segments. For example, the expansion of Carrfoure Chain globally, had offered a wide range of vacancies in many countries in different fields such as finance, sales and procurement… etc. In contrast, local stores can’t present such opportunities.
Moreover, hyper markets pay a substantial amount of fund to the government, unlike small and local shops. This is because in many countries it is known that large enterprises are obligated to raise fund in form of donation, to show their social responsibility to the locals. In addition, not only donations are the only source of fund but also taxes should be considered. A large supermarket pays immense taxes to the host government, these tax inflows are resulted from the significant sales volume. Governments could later utilize these taxes to enhance the local community standards of living.
In conclusion, despite the missing ability of local stores to compete, its failure doesn’t mean the death of local community. I believe that had it not been for such expanding, many countries would have suffered financially, hence, it would survive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47148288973 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03590202795 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6540938439 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257943605542 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850258249624 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887312535055 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168560638794 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110926919832 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.