Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Many languages become extinct every year. While most of the individuals convicts it is a favorable pattern as a world with lesser languages encourages peace and understanding between residents. In my opinion languages are the sign of our ancestral civilization and should be protected. Therefore, every language should be protected and promoted.
Our world is amalgamation of plethora of languages, it changes from one region to the another. Moreover, they are sign of our cultural heritage as well as portrays the picture of old civilization. Furthermore, every language has historical importance, at the same time represents a particular society or community as a whole. Beside this, it is an integral mode of communication among the group of people. Furthermore, every native language has emotional attachment among its speakers and is precious for them,simultaneously, extinction will have negative impacts on its speaking group while at the same time it will create hindrances for the people who are not multilingual.
However, a group of people believe that there can be only single language as it will bring uniformity in the world. For instance, China is hiring English speaking people to promote their trade. Moreover, it will support the economy positively and will also be an impetus for the students to get eminence in universally accepted language. Undoubtedly, world is changing and espousing one language to bring everyone at the one page , gradually removing the communication barriers.
To conclude, it is believed after analyzing both sides the language reflects a specific group and their emergence in this vast world. Therefore, they should be safeguarded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , simultaneously
...ng its speakers and is precious for them,simultaneously, extinction will have negative impacts ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nguage to bring everyone at the one page , gradually removing the communication ba...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46360153257 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18170466357 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8437781339 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255422425287 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085434145678 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459444967019 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156033499302 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353446304847 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.