Figures show that some countries have an increasing proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older. What do you think the effects of this may be.
Society is changing inchmeal and progressing constantly as the expansion of technological revolutions, which means the rate of young laborer plays a prominent role in many countries. Therefore, the growth in proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older may cause many effects.
First of all, looking at the narrow aspects. The more residents who are old, the more lack of creativity and explosion. In business, there is less potential project attracting many investments may affect directly to economy of enterprise. In many fields, the shortage of young human resources leads to the freshness of idea, which is the necessity in contemporary life. For instance: the development of a company depends on how they bring effective ways on solving problems to community, which are unique from others, the young are able to do this better than elder because of their enthusiasm.
In the wide sight, the rise of population aging indicates the increasing of mortality rate and the lack of laborer. Therefore, the obvious growth of unemployed rate is the big trouble for their government, which can interrupt the progress in many developing countries, especially in economical field. Moreover, robots and artificial intelligence are increasing for catering humankind ‘s life, the population aging in some countries make their resident’s life not to catch up with the change of the world.
In many ways, the increasing of proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older may single out many negative effects. Therefore, government might have solution for this problem as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-27 | Annie18122005 | 68 | view |
- Nowadays governments are investing more in public transport such as buses and trains rather than in building new roads What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 67
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
- Nowadays governments are investing more in public transport such as buses and trains rather than in building new roads What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 86
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 60 or older may cause many effects. First of all, looking at the narrow aspe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han elder because of their enthusiasm. In the wide sight, the rise of populatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...catch up with the change of the world. In many ways, the increasing of proporti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95860726248 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58203125 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7584618662 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233422956349 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843129440203 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972034686593 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154543282874 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731883908278 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.