In recent years, there has been a vast increase in the number of people using a car as a main of transportation. Researchers reveal that the first car was found on British roads in 1888 and the number of cars increase to approximately 29 million in the year 2000. The argument of whether or not car ownership should be limited by the laws have a great debate.
There is no denying that invention of the car made human life easier, such as saving people in the fire, the fire trucks can quickly arrive at the scene to put out the fire. With the technological development, car production is fast, and the price become lower. The number of people affords to buy a car increase cause the traffic congestion. In addition, the air pollution problem is being serious in regard to the overwhelming number of cars that emit CO2.
As such, we should encourage people to use public transport instead of the car which not only reduce the traffic congestion, also decrease CO2 emission and the fuel crisis. Public transport including public buses, railways, trams, etc. is the best alternative to cars because they can carry a large number of people or products at a time, as well as bicycles do not cost much and do not require fuel.
In my point of opinion, too many problems are caused by overwhelming vehicles. Therefore, the government should limit the ownership of cars in a bid to lessen air pollution and solve traffic congestion problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...llion in the year 2000. The argument of whether or not car ownership should be limited by the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ernative to cars because they can carry a large number of people or products at a time, as well a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as well as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68343180432 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6282990433 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296899829056 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102506643408 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924906049901 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171817029522 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11799941306 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.