It is sometimes argued that foreign travelers and tourists from overseas should be charged more than local citizens for the cultural and historical attractions, I completely disagree with that view.
Firstly, I believe that is a shortsighted view. The idea of charging foreign travelers more than local visitors to visit important places often depended on the reason in order to keep those places going. Which means that tourists from overseas and residents already pay money to contribute the important places through the tax system. In other word, foreign visitors often pay money for foods, services and souvenirs when they traveling, and it can contribute to the country’s economy as well as the inhabitant’s life standard. The government should encourage foreign visitors to visit instead of charging them more.
Secondly, if people realized that they have to pay more money in order to visit historical and cultural attractions, they would perhaps decide not go to that country on holiday. Thailand for example, the tourism industry cost the travelers from overseas double than local residents if they want to visit any park in this country. It can make the foreign visitors are less excited when they travel to Thailand or Thailand will no longer is the first choice of place to visit when people decide to go on a holiday. In that case this country will lost tons of traveler per year and cause an adverse effect on the tourism industry as well as the economy of Thailand.
In conclusion, I believe that the idea that charge foreign visitors more than local citizens in order to visit important places could be counterproductive in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...holiday. In that case this country will lost tons of traveler per year and cause an ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09124087591 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7379098903 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481751824818 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8046263845 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.818181818 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329856837075 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130532276888 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10060483019 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233066959455 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723588584318 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.