As you know, most of the countries use fossil fuels as main energy sources because they don't want to depend on natural sources. Because natural disasters like tsunami, hurricanes, an avalanche could happen at any time without any intimation. So, the government concerned about spending abundant money on fitting machinery like a windmill, solar panel. Due to the economy crisis, rather than putting huge investment on those machines, they could get electricity from burning coal, gas and oil. Impending lack of electricity, almost many nation's is looking for alternate energy resources.
Firstly, to produce fossil fuels, dig deep into the earth's core, there possibility of getting oil, gas, and coal. The generation of fossil fuels will be like, burning coal with water, the steam of water bubbles generates gas which is called CO2 alias carbon dioxide. In Dubai, the process of metal purification, most of the electricity is getting from burned CO2. In addition to that, they are manufacturing 2.4 million automobile parts which lead to gain 114 crores claimed by HSC. But, the excess of Carbon dioxide, would impact habitants in the atmosphere.
In Contrast, implement renewable energies like solar and windmill will be the better option. For the sonar panel, the investment would be very less, cost-effective, no manpower required. Moreover, it grasps sun rays in the plates and it converts rays into electricity. However, we couldn't rely on only solar power, we can have alternate power sources called air to electricity converter. With that, windmill converts the flows of air into electric energy.
As a result, impacting natural habitants would make a way to disaster for future descendants. So make use of natural energies which earth devoted to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...els as main energy sources because they dont want to depend on natural sources. Beca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...erts rays into electricity. However, we couldnt rely on only solar power, we can have a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast, you know, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24822695035 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70635918927 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656028368794 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2869238744 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0588235294 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210904533962 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596411082019 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677572174677 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119541104852 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590067639639 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.