Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main resources in many nations, but in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind and solar energy) is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Non-renewable energy sources like petrol, diesel, oil and many more are the prime fuels on which many countries are dependent on various functions including electricity generation in the power plants. However, some nations have been promoting the utilization of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind energy. It has both pros and cons. Definitely, I think it is a positive development because it has become more essential to divert our focus from fossil fuels due to many reasons.
Opponents of non-renewable energy resources cite a host of disadvantages. Oil, natural gas and coals are often costly to use. Because they are not available directly in nature; they are derived from post-processing of crude oil. In addition, their consumption emits many toxic gases like Nox and Sox in the environment. As a consequence, many cities in India, for example, Delhi and Mumbai have the lowest air quality, which has affected their locals' life. Moreover, their limited amount of resources have disturbed many homes' monthly budget as they are paying more and more for such fuels. Therefore, a few continents like India and Netherland are exploring other ways of energy.
On the other hand, renewable energy sources have many benefits. Firstly, the operating cost is nearer to zero. if someone has a few acres of infertile land and he or she installs a series of solar panels there, then he can generate a huge amount of electricity free of cost, and even, it can be sold to any electricity providers at an impressive price. Secondly and most importantly, they are completely pollution-free and more durable. Wind farms in the western region of Gujarat, India, for instance, wherein a thousand number of wind-fans have been installed which are producing zero-cost and non-pollutive energy since last five decades. So, search valid points encourage many nations to promote these alternative energy resources.
In conclusion, it is the right time to start the use of such energy sources, which are not only economical but also environment-friendly as well as more productive than non-renewable energy sources. Personally, I believe that it is a positive development as many countries have seen their fruitful outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
..., the operating cost is nearer to zero. if someone has a few acres of infertile la...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26610644258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98740250905 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.940364795 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9473684211 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3684210526 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263099783185 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785770646204 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687054132488 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163407161745 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584700895809 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.