Nowadays, young people are admiring media and sports stars even though they do not set a good example. Do you think it is a positive development or a negative development?
The youth have been following their favourite celebrities from entertainment industries for many years although their social behaviour or acts are not good for society. It has both pros and cons. I believe that it is always fruitful for an individual as well as for a nation when youngsters become a huge fan of actors or players.
Proponents of celebrities cite a host of benefits. They see such professionals as their role models and obey principles seriously. As a result, it brings some sense of discipline in youngsters' life, and definitely, it fosters many positive changes in them. Salman Khan, for example, has motivated a plethora of young people to exercise daily to stay healthy and fit rather than wasting time behind some non-productive works.
In addition, many popular faces have gained worldwide popularity. People do not hesitate to pay a handsome amount of money to view their favourites' performance whether it is in a movie or a sports match. Indian premier league, for instance, is a widely popular cricket tournament, and the Indian cricket board has earned a massive profit from it till year due to its large viewership.
On the other hand, many adults obey blindly film actors and sports players. They want to copy that flashy lifestyle rather than seeing the struggle that anyone had done in his or her life. Despite any talent or artistic skills, youth waste the best the most their most crucial time after being a 'celebrity'. In the end, they can neither study properly nor live happily.
In conclusion, one must have an idol in his or her life, but youth ought to follow the hard work and dedication of their favourites. I reiterate that media and sports starts can create a positive environment in the world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96271186441 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68650430337 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1665880502 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994603701376 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299055174848 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376592090108 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514937983476 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214477891904 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.