Giving Pocket Money to Children is very common in many countries. Discuss both the advantages as well as disadvantages about the practice and what is your opinion about it.
Childhood is the perfect time to learn money management. It is increasingly become normal to give some pocket money to children. In my opinion, this would be beneficial for them to learn the basics of financial management, and saving despite the drawbacks such as bad habits, and poor associations. Let us discuss this further to have a better understanding.
Firstly, considering the benefits, by giving pocket money, children can realize the value of finance. To elaborate, when children own their cash, they learn not to waste because if they did, they would have trouble buying what they truly needed. For instance, a child can spend his pocket money to buy candy if their parent packs him a delicious lunch. But if he had to buy his lunch from the given cash, he would reconsider spending on candy, which teaches them how to manage it properly and responsibly. Moreover, parents can instruct them to save a portion of that money and afford whatever they desired, which encourages children to save and use money more consciously.
One the other hand, focusing on the negatives. Firstly, when they grow older, this money can be spent on consuming unhealthy products such as alcohol or cigarette. Secondly, by using this money, they could involve in some bad companies such as clubs and pubs, especially when they are in adolescence. In contrast, if they did not have money, the risk of such drawbacks would be minimized.
However, alcohol consumption or smoking, and getting involved with damaging people cannot be avoided just by not giving pocket money. Proper parental and school guidance is mandatory to prevent children from such detrimental habits.
To sum up, despite the negative side of alcohol addiction, smoking and wasting time with harmful people, giving some cash to children with proper guidance would upskill their financial management skills and saving habits.
Comments
Nice.
It goes without saying that childhood is one of the best times of a person’s life tremendously. So, taking money to develop itself is essential to some extent. Now I would like to concentrate on both views according to my supporting argument and subsequently I will write the conclusion.
Advocates of this believe that, some juveniles are paramount intelligent as well as clever. They are taking extra money from their guardians and sometimes they are spending it to worst contents or unproductive sectors. In my view, this tendency is harmful for his future as it can divert, and he could be misleading somehow. In this reason, nowadays rowdy youngsters are committing with an illegal job such as murder, rape, assault and so much unlawful occupation. For instance, numerous studies have constantly found that, crimes involved by adolescent, were linked to pocket money. Hence, I would say, regularly getting pocket money could be increase disordering to some extent.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned disadvantage, it has many positives as well. I think, if parent gives proper nurture by splendid parenting to their offspring definitely will not be dishonest/third-rate. In my experience, every mom and dad intents to provide money because, it could be helpful for their child suddenly. When I was younger, we were no come from the rich family although my mom would always give me extra money and truly, I would used to hoard that money apart from expenses. Consequently, I prefer to give scholarship to my children and I always take care them nicely, till to date they are good going.
To sum up, considering everything, donating pocket money is not only requisite but also crucial from the family but young people should expend it on the special occasion or save. On that way, particularly they will learn how to control the pace of money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1461038961 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64100376955 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3758001953 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136498880219 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552879645289 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496570143661 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808187147978 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344053253843 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.