Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
Currently there is a contentious argument over whether the responsibility for financing and controlling scientific research should be fulfilled from the end of the government or the private organizations? Government organizations have a laid back work culture and sometime government employees lack focus and motivation. In this essay I will discuss that why I disagree that government should be responsible for funding and organizing research.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of rationale reasons that prove that the responsibility for funding and controlling scientific research should depend on private funding. Such organizations often have tough targets and strict work timings which allow them to remain more focused. Moreover, monetary incentives and promotions are often associated with the success of any private research so motivation towards innovation is much better. For instance, Tesla Pvt limited is a private organization headed by Elon Musk that has outperformed the government organizations within three years.
On the contrary, others argue that government organizations should shoulder the accountability of handling the research sector as huge funding is required for conducting research which can only be provided by government funds. However, I believe that private organizations are profit based and thus large sum of money as well as future of the organization is at stake. This in itself acts as the motivation factor for private organizations for participating whole heartedly in research. Moreover, the government of a country has to handle more serious concerns in terms of financial budget rather than just concentrating on exploration work.
In conclusion, I believe that although certain government organizations are handling the research funding and controlling well but it is the private organizations that have come to the forefront in recent years. They are not only outperforming but are more focused and driven by motivation to succeed. Does the future of innovation lie with the hands of private organizations? Still remains a question.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66453674121 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25105265471 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533546325879 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0677336638 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35519856125 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126906562462 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101325848593 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236274583216 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073186460439 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.