It is irrefutable that the pristine natural beautiful places in the world are getting destroyed owing to constant urbanization and overpopulation. These places provide many benefits by attracting tourist and by preserving the biodiversity of a country. This essay will delve into the advantages of having natural places and propose some measures for their conservation.
Looking firstly at the benefits, natural beautiful spots are a source of national pride and identity. This is because such places can be considered as magnet for tourist which causes influx of them from all over the world. In other words, tourist usually loves to visit a country that has lots of natural places where they would be able to relax and enjoy the picturesque beautiful scenarios. This, in turn, flourishes the tourism industry of the country by increasing the revenue from this sector, and ultimately, propels the wheel of economic advancement of the nation. Moreover, these places are often full of biodiversity. To elaborate, there exists a harmonious relation between different kinds of animal and plant species. Therefore, destroying these places would bring about devastating effect to the environment by tearing down the ecological balance.
To preserve these places, two effective solutions can be implemented. Firstly, the government should impose stricter laws, which would prohibit destruction of such places. To clarify, harsher punishment and fine should be given to industries or any individuals who litter or damage natural places so that it can act as a deterrent for them. Take Bangladesh for example, the local authority has introduced a law which fines any citizens, if they are found destroying the country’s tourist attraction spots. Secondly, government should not let development of any factories or industries near these places. In short, constructing buildings of multinational companies by encroachment of such places ought to be completely restricted. If the government had taken these steps earlier, then we would not have lost the natural places which have already vanished.
To conclude, preserving the naturally significant places add to a country’s economic progression and save the existence of biodiversity. The government can protect these places by passing stringent laws and limiting the invasion of companies to such precious places.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in short, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56509695291 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00507419445 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4815737239 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.736842105 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277744593214 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825833228512 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583452586223 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183016365532 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595915537784 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.