Individuals can do nothing to change society. New developments can be only brought about by governments and large institutions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been a matter of debate since long that changes in society can only be brought by governments and large institutions rather than individuals. Although it can never be denied that government and large institutions have the power and resource to bring new developments however in my opinion both government, large institutions and individuals need to work hand in hand to bring positive changes in the society which can make this world a better living place. In this essay I will elucidate my opinion with relevant examples.
First and foremost governments globally have always been policy makers and facilitator for its society. They can provide world-class facilities like education, health care and security for their people however it is for an individual to use such facilities and innovate to bring changes in the society. For instance in Singapore government is providing funding to some brilliant individuals from National University of Singapore to build its first communication satellite. Similarly in developing countries like India government is facilitating resources to individuals to start manufacturing space components in India therefore it is evident that individuals and government need to work jointly to bring new developments in the society.
Similarly large corporation have funding and resources to bring new developments in the society however when we look at specific examples from companies like Apple it can be seen that individuals like Steve Jobs have made a difference by inventing cool communication gadgets like MacBook’s, Phones.
In conclusion it is evident from above examples that although government and large corporations have a larger role to play to trigger a change in the society however they must co-work with individuals to bring such changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...uild its first communication satellite. Similarly in developing countries like India gove...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...g new developments in the society. Similarly large corporation have funding and reso...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5017921147 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1227299022 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512544802867 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3184564415 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.555555556 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255355202955 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110736560128 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720249715238 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152040302705 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619535077045 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.