It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
It has been claimed that further technological developments will result in traditional cultures’ disappearance and that these two things can’t exist together. I strongly agree with those statements since technology had made it possible to reach far-away destinations, that were destructed and modernised as a result. Moreover, due to its’ many options, technology leads young people to abandon their cultural lives.
Technology developments have brought to the creation of new transportation means such as airplanes and ships. These innovations enabled the discovery of unknown wild areas that were inhabited by tribes and unmodernised communities. This invasion caused the most significant lost of distanced cultures. For example, Europeans’ colonies in Africa led to the extinction of many African tribes. As technology will keep renovate, new regions will be discovered and more traditional communities will disappear.
In addition, the main feature of technology is that it has eased our lives in terms of communication, transportation, food supplement, etc. Therefore, when people from old cultures are being exposed to technology in teaches them about other ways of living, which leads to young members to leave their community and search for a different future. For example, I traveled in Georgia where I met a traditional village woman. Her lives were simple and lacked of modern devices accept of a single mobile phone. This phone enabled her to see photos of modern society that made her dream about moving out from the village.
In conclusion, the development of new transportation means caused the destruction of distanced cultures and in my opinion it will continue to do so in the future. In addition, I believe that traditional communities and technology can’t exist together since the latter causes young people to leave their tradition.
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bucycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best soulution to traffic congestion? 73
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water pollution and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree? 56
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regionasl towns? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58536585366 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18717259911 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595818815331 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6872510126 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.866666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271433099329 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810173582128 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621115263373 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165246906733 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376161222105 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.