In this modern era, the rate of species extinction has escalated staggeringly compared to that of during the ancient history. However, a proportion states that human should not make effort for prevention the animal extinction as this phenomenon is natural process. Personally, a sharp disagreement is my point of views. In this essay, information and evidence are given to clarify my portion of views.
Firstly, human beings activities have contributed enormously to the animal extinction. Nowadays, about one-half of the world’s tropical rain-forests have been destroyed to meet the requirement of agriculture spaces and wood gathering. The deforestation process leads to the loss of living environment for animals, alongside with the pollution partly originated from carbon dioxide emission when burning fossil fuels to operate transportation vehicles or running factories causing to the server death of animals. Due to numerous studies, thirty six animals directly lost to history due to human activities and animal extinction happening one thousand times faster because of humans. Currently, the disappearance of species is no longer natural process but mankind immense impact on environment.
Secondly, the role that each species playing in an ecosystem is significant important. The disappearance of an animal leading to another animal extinction causes the loss of biodiversity and food chain. Consequently, the lower productivity of agriculture directly damages to the lives of human beings. For example, in the past, the campaign of China government to eliminate the sparrows causing the staggering disaster of locusts that destroyed most of the crops, and thirty million people starved to death in 1959 to 1961, as a result. Apparently, human have to prevent the extinction from happening as the consequences have directly influence on our lives.
To conclude, due to the above-mentions reasons, I believe the action to prevent animals from extinction are the priority of people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6357615894 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10666620989 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.520438781 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.466666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242819814051 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751788823226 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702101527049 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148321103409 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372217193044 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.