It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people have different viewpoints about the responsibility of humanity over wildlife conservation. In my opinion, While it is suggested that the spending should be diverted to help human populations humans should divert their attention from animal protection, I strongly believe that it is still worthy an issue of concern of consideration.
First of all, animals, as a significant part of an ecosystem, have profound impacts on the biological diversity in the eco-system. Since all animals are connected together in a food chain, the termination of one species will eventually lead to the overpopulation or underpopulation of other animals. Much as some people don’t want to admit, every kind of animals is of fundamental importance in ecology. Take vultures as an example, if it were not for their feeding on carcasses, the environment would be heavily polluted and somehow damage the well-being of humanity.
Secondly, since natural selection is an inevitable process, fighting against it will encourage the creativity of humans in global technology race. People are likely to invent machines to not only preserve animals and wildlife but also improve the living condition in many other places wild animals and their habitats but also improve human living condition all over the world. By doing so, the expenditure in of animal protection is no longer a stopgap measure but an enduring solution to maintain sustainability.
Last but not least, saving species from extinction dying out is also a way to compensate for the harm human caused to the environment. Take dodos as an example, the harmless creature had become extinct for been pushed to the verge of extinction/ disappearance because of the over poaching and mass killing of men, just because they expressed no fear towards them. Humanity shouldn’t let any other species undergo the same process again, under no circumstances. Thus, under no circumstances should human let any other species suffer from the same process again.
From what has been discussed, animal conservation is a forward step in the sustainable development of one nation and overall population. It should become a worthwhile investment, besides other strategies to improve living condition of citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-29 | mimeomahong | 78 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaurs, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others.Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? 84
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is positive development, while many countries think they will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 89
- Nowadays, young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er wildlife conservation. In my opinion, While it is suggested that the spending ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an issue of concern of consideration. First of all, animals, as a significant ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...how damage the well-being of humanity. Secondly, since natural selection is an ...
^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e world. By doing so, the expenditure in of animal protection is no longer a stop...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es suffer from the same process again. From what has been discussed, animal con...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, kind of, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4164305949 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0908735571 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589235127479 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7596217074 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.466666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226048279237 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717536722073 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394196079251 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113016811349 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526494518436 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.