Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.

There are lots of language variations in the world. And some countries may also use different first language. This may cause barrier in the communication that may lead to social problems. But, in this millennial era, technology has developed fast. This development can help overcoming social problems, although not all. So i only partly agree with the statement in this question.

In my opinion, an inability to understand the foreign language where we live will create some problems in our daily life. Consider an example, where we go to the local markets and unable to communicate what we are looking for, and not being able to understand what they explain are something hard to face. This will restrict us to communicate with the local people in the country, and thus can make us feel stressful and depressed.

But, in this millennial era, where technology has developed fast, this problem is hard to resolved anymore. For the example, there is application called Google Translate, where we can search for the translation of any language. Google Translate also provides they correct way to pronounce the translation, so it can help people to speak it to the local people. Google Translate also has features where people can take a picture of any "unknown language" and translate it into the language that we know.

Another example is the availability of GPS. GPS stands for Global Positioning System. It is an application that shows us our position and provide the way to almost all places in the world. For instance, we are lost in a country where we don't understand the language. We can easily tap our phone and search for the route in the GPS. The situation is different than where technology has not developed, where asking people was "the only way" to find out the correct route to strange places.

So in conclusion, inability to speak in a foreign language can still cause social problems, but not that serious. Because, the establishment of new technology helps overcoming the problems.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to overcome' or 'overcome'.
Suggestion: to overcome; overcome
...veloped fast. This development can help overcoming social problems, although not all. So i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... example is the availability of GPS. GPS stands for Global Positioning System. It...
^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ance, we are lost in a country where we dont understand the language. We can easily ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... in the GPS. The situation is different than where technology has not developed, whe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... social problems, but not that serious. Because, the establishment of new technology he...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to overcome' or 'overcome'.
Suggestion: to overcome; overcome
...e establishment of new technology helps overcoming the problems.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03869047619 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81839895358 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485119047619 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1709498944 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.619047619 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251228331172 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777032828311 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099409698415 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168328352776 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120364789825 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.