It is often argued that public library maintenance is a waste of taxpayers money, due to the fact the modern gadgets such as computers and tablets replace its primary role. While it is prominent that state-of-the-art technology indeed brings great impact to the way people studies, I still strongly believed that public libraries is still worth the penny for every taxpayer. This essay seeks to enlist a few reasons behind this thought, followed by a logical conclusion.
Firstly, we are in the stage where technology is so vast that we can cherry-pick any tool that we wanted to help us in our daily studies. But, that is not in the case for every individual, particularly in developing countries. People reside in this territories struggles to have something on their plate,much more to have a gadget to aid them with their research. For example, people living in rural areas such as mountains doesn't even have money, electricity, or even allowed to bring home a book. Hence, these young ones rely on libraries to do there assignment and research.
Secondly, though technology offers convenience in the way that a book can be squeeze into a couple of mega bytes and can be accessed globally using the internet, it still has its own disadvantage. Research shows that frequent use of gadgets greatly affects the persons vision, this is due to the radiation that is transmitted during utilization. For example, young ones who uses tablets or computers to do their research often uses eyeglasses due there vision is getting blurry from too much screen exposure.
In conclusion, money use to maintain public libraries is worth every penny since it doesn't only cater indigent students, but also it is merits peoples wellness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... developing countries. People reside in this territories struggles to have something...
^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , much
...ruggles to have something on their plate,much more to have a gadget to aid them with ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...living in rural areas such as mountains doesnt even have money, electricity, or even a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'bringing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: bringing
...ave money, electricity, or even allowed to bring home a book. Hence, these young ones re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...creen exposure. In conclusion, money use to maintain public libraries is worth e...
^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...libraries is worth every penny since it doesnt only cater indigent students, but also ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03135888502 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76297612676 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0813274454 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179039436882 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602407154808 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604426821351 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113711926771 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462526938501 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.