in many countries, more money is spent on the transport system in the cities. In contrast, very little is spent in rural areas. what are the effects of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
There are certain nations where cities are prioritized over rural areas when it comes to utilizing funds for constructing roads and other transport facilities. As a result, it affects the overall development of such countries., There are multiple steps that must be taken for sorting out such an issue as described in the essay below.
To begin with, people start migrating in cities when they find countrysides un-attractive or under-developed. It makes the cities overcrowded where the resources of such places are unable to meet the demands of the growing population. For instance, problems of space for building parks and water availability are very common in Chandigarh; a result of the mass inflow of people there. Another negative outcome of paying less attention to villages is that people leave their work such as farming and carpentry and move to the place with good infrastructure and better living conditions. Consequently, this creates an imbalance at every job market. To illustrate, three out of every five farmers work as laborers in cities today, according to the reports. So, people find it difficult to get jobs in cities whereas in villages the demands of the workforce are increasing. In sum, it affects the development of such nations.
One of the effective solutions would be for the governments to give equal weight to both cities and their counterparts. This could be justified as people staying in the underprivileged areas too are contributing to the economy through taxes. Hence, they deserve equal treatment. Secondly, encouraging industrialists to settle and run their businesses in places away from cities would help to mitigate the issues of comparative less development in villages. For example, the government would definitely pay attention if businesses start in villages. Furthermore, awakening people to raise their voice and demand justice would be a better option; after all, they too vote and have the right to fight against injustice.
In conclusion, villages are as important as cities. Governments should try their best to resolve the disparity of quality of life in both sectors. Spending money equally would aid countries to flourish. Perhaps in the future, people being made aware of their rights, there is hope that we will enjoy all the basic needs of life available everywhere in our countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-23 | am155 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | Ramandeep Dhillon | 84 | view |
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agr 73
- Some people think that machines have decreased the work load of people.Others, however, believe that these have more negative effects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use their money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such solutions? 78
- some people find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children? 78
- it has been noted that people prefer to live in rented apartments. What are the advantages and the disadvantages of this trend? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...nomy through taxes. Hence, they deserve equal treatment. Secondly, encouraging indust...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2420212766 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95164242706 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.40936089 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.55 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080288630456 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0240792663051 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266350626624 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508455212865 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112505196738 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.