International sports events, like World Cup or Olimpic, are considered 4-year period events where hosting countries welcome millions of spectators and thousands of professional players across the globe. Some people assume that it is a good thing for the country, while others argue it is bad. This essay will outline both statements and give my personal opinion.
To begin with, multiple high-income nations are working hard to pose its influences to take the chance to become hosting global sports events country due to several beneficial effects. The country has a wonderful time to introduce its beautiful, and spectacular belongings to foreigners as a way of advertisements when almost all people throughout the planet are watching any latest news revolving around his or her national teams. For example, Russia had successfully hosted the World Cup 2018, where witnessed numerous unexpected scenes during the tournament, and thus the country offered a deeper image amongst citizens toward the actual Russian’s attitude and hospitality, and a series of well-known buildings and sight-seeing nature. With professional preparation in each match, Russia became one of the greatest World Cup tournaments in history.
At the same time, there are a couple of dark sides hidden behind the glowing-look global sports events. Firstly, a hosting nation must take a part of its national budget for restoring the degraded stadiums or building the new ones that allow serving a hundred thousand spectators. It is extremely costly especially in financially disadvantaged nations like Brazil, where are facing an alarming number of crimes due to the problem of poverty. Secondly, bad images could be transmitted across the world if the hosting country is struggling with numerous social unrest arising from poverty. Brazil, for example, hosted the World Cup 2014, and once encounter critical disapproval from locals. As a result, many unwanted scenes including larceny and slums in Brazil stormed all social networking sites, and subsequently, global foreigners did not prefer to visit the country.
In conclusion, although international sports events provide a hosting nation with a good chance to advertise its images, bad images are also included.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ill outline both statements and give my personal opinion. To begin with, multiple high-income n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48843930636 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87314201469 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627167630058 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7471846673 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.642857143 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228022055967 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742879672381 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610444872421 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159980283933 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570182729085 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.