In many countries, young people are finding it harder and harder to find permanent jobs. Why is this? What can be done to
improve the situation?
A permanent job is always a dream for any college graduate . But, in several nations across the world, it is getting tough for many youngsters to find suitable and permanent employment.
There are a couple of noticeable reasons. Firstly, many redundant jobs which earlier involved human intervention have been replaced by machines or robots. Because, machines commit less errors, are more efficient and do need regular pay hikes thereby reducing overhead costs of the company. For example, many chocolate manufacturers in the U.S. have replaced employees by machines to achieve greater accuracy in making chocolates along with achieving immaculate, consistent and attractive packaging. As a result, employee strength was reduced by 30% and no more jobs were created by the industry.
Secondly, a more compelling reason for multinationals to not hire youngsters as permanent employees because they simply do not have long term visibility of projects. Therefore, they are, most of the time, looking for candidates who can work on temporary basis, which does not suit any fresher seeking employment. For example, plethora of IT companies and government of India undertaking institutions hire people who are keen on working on contract for a couple of months. Furthermore, there is also no assurity whether the contract will get renewed after expiration. Hence a large section of young professionals find it difficult or are somewhat hesitant to work on contract position due to job insecurity.
If there are problems, then there are ought to be solutions as well. In order to improve the situation, companies that have started to replace humans with robots/machines must setup a research and developments where young and energetic graduates can put their minds to work on how to optimize the overall business process as well as enhance the automation algorithms. Moreover, governments must change their mindset or policy to offer permanent or at least long term positions to young and fresh minds. This way the government can hit not just two, but three, stones: Job creation, brain drain to private sector or foreign countries, and last but not the least, a sense of security in the minds of its citizens. Moreover, youngsters should also enhance their skills perpetually to be in the race.
In conclusion, as stated earlier, that there is no problem in this world that cannot be solved. Problems of automation or robots taking over jobs is definitely a threat for humanity. Young job seekers can, in fact, rather, must ram themselves up with updated skills and technologies. Government and private sector companies can also play a helping hand in order to maintain the balance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... always a dream for any college graduate . But, in several nations across the worl...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nes or robots. Because, machines commit less errors, are more efficient and do need ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...es because they simply do not have long term visibility of projects. Therefore, they...
^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ract will get renewed after expiration. Hence a large section of young professionals ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2258.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2511627907 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89147820443 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583720930233 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2871986508 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.523809524 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4761904762 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139059534954 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382783464652 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330203130501 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787422590735 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329897747929 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.