Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree?
In recent years, there has been paramount upsurge in the ongoing debate that social working sites had drastic impact on citizens and prodigies. To some extent it has negative facets. In this essay, I will elaborate both merits and demerits of the advance technology that made easier in communication throughout the world via, social networking.
At the outset, there are multitudes of benefits, firstly, in today’s world everything has become online and having social media the appropriate use of social networking had open the gateways of bright future resulting not only communicating on personal issues, but also cope up in dealing between company’s business. For example, China is using all his resources using the Facebook network through posting, innovated in fast tracking railway system by which not only Africa but Canada, United States are involved in the innovative ways for the growth of their country. Clearly, to say that social networking site such as Facebook in today’s world has become a preponderant site reaching out through people as well as commercial means.
However, there are some pitfalls that can overwhelmed on the potential benefits in using social networking that are escalating using Facebook are leading to threats, violence. For instance, most of the famous politicians hard trying for secure of the nation, they keep on posting about the innocence to be highlighted, but their actual scenario seems to be different, posting and diverting the negative impacts on religious impacts are some of the drastic impacts for which it results in violence, cruelty and blood-shed.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can conclude that despite of having advantages of socialized networking, but the upsides that can look by the Facebook company to limit and access more securities for better nation which are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...gative impacts on religious impacts are some of the drastic impacts for which it results in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41216216216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86438675256 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60472972973 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.755714324 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.0 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8888888889 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213437650009 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925407120985 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505083981533 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116932803934 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381709200391 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.