Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Whilst some members of the society underscore the importance of the technological advancement for increasing working standard of employees on their work place, however others advocates that introducing these technologies have no convenience to workers. There are rational arguments on both views of this contentious top which will be discussed in details followed by my opinion.
It is evident that modern technology has made employee's life easire by providing advance computers, smartphones and many other new technological gadgets. In old days everything was manuel and workers has to struggle a lot to complete their office tasks, but in this modern era everything is digitalised and nobody nolonger required to spend hours and hours to complete their jobs. As an example, accountants have Microsoft Excel which help them to perform advance calculations in split of a second. Therefore, with the help of technology employees have been able to perfom work wiht a higer accuracy and efficiency.
However, on the flipside of this, technology has made user more monotonus and less creative. It has taken out the thinking capability of the employee who obsessed with technology. Darker side of this is people will not work thier own initiative and their skills will buried under the skin. The very moment employees stranded without computers and softwares they are in a deep deep trouble find noway out due their higher dependancy on machines.
In, my opinion, morden techonology has invade people's lives too much. As result, workers are unable to keep their work and familiy life in balance which has caused lot familiy issues. Work from home concept which enable employee to perfom job function from home, instead of providing benefits it has caused inefficiencies such as a distractions to work and low quality work output.
In conclusion, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, it is my firm conviction that undoubtedly, improved technology has provided immense benefits to the working society and It is just the matter of the way how someone utilize it for the betterment of their working lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'bury'
Suggestion: bury
...er own initiative and their skills will buried under the skin. The very moment employe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: deep
...t computers and softwares they are in a deep deep trouble find noway out due their higher...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'invaded'.
Suggestion: invaded
... In, my opinion, morden techonology has invade peoples lives too much. As result, work...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a distraction' or simply 'distractions'?
Suggestion: a distraction; distractions
...ts it has caused inefficiencies such as a distractions to work and low quality work output. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25655976676 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84677418879 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7436460325 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.785714286 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157697053055 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546354639125 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498673072683 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085381631564 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037932698775 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.