Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Other think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A number of people think that the new technologies can help employees improve the level of their lives. This issue is not entirely straightforward and arguments can be made against the idea. This essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view.
On the one hand, those who refuse the positive effects of the new technologies point that although the use of the latest technology could help be done all duties through the easier and faster ways, it can not have dramatic effects on the level of life. This group indicates that the improvement in the level of employees' lives needs to earn more money. In one word, the more they get money, the more they can improve their lives. The examples can be seen in some companies in which workers can use the newest technology to do their responsibilities not only must they work further in less time, but also receive the salary as same as other companies.
By contrast, those who support the beneficial effects of the new technology on employees' lives cite various benefits. These range from the decrease of the stress level to passing the habit of the use of technology to their families. This group claims that companies in which employees use the new technologies, they will not put under the strong pressure of their tasks. This is because individuals would be able to do the best thanks to technology improvements. In addition, another argument is that employees are able to learn how to use the latest technology in their workplaces. Thus, they could pass their experiences to the family members in order to do daily affairs easily. As a result, the habit of the use of technology will be expanded over societies.
On balance, it seems obvious that if the use of new technology expands, the positive impacts of it will be seen on both the level of employees' lives and societies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7868338558 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65634723984 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479623824451 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4455915399 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196611832388 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756404903226 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513497316435 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141101899876 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272133917673 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.